Thor: The Dark World

It’s been a few days since I’ve seen this movie, and I’m still not sure what I have to say about it.

Thor:  The Dark World is obviously the follow up to Thor, and the next chapter of Marvel’s Avengers-related movies.  Thor is probably the Avengers lead that I’m inherently least interested in,  but that has not kept me from enjoying this film quite a bit.  It’s a lot of fun, full of grand battles, crazy high-fantasy images, and enough characterization to get you through.

Thor as a hero, played by Chris Hemsworth, is likeable enough, and this time around we only have to accept him being in love with Jane Foster (played by Natalie Portman), which is a slightly easier sell than having to accept him falling in love with Jane Foster, so it’s a step up from the first film in that regard.  I don’t remember the first movie so well, but actually overall the impression is that the sequel is bigger, grander, and crazier than before (so you know, like a typical sequel).

Christopher Eccleston (who I enjoyed a lot as the lead role in Doctor Who back in 2005) appears as the film’s ostensible “main” villain, and rarely has a more threat with less personality reared his make-up covered face on the big screen.  The script gives Eccleston nothing to do except to be mean and fierce, so our focus isn’t the plight of Malekith and his merry band of Dark Eves, but rather on the internal politics of Asgard, the home of the mythic pseudo-gods that Thor hails from.  And these politics mainly have to do with the royal family’s response to the wayward son Loki, whom the plot contrives to turn into a necessary ally of Thor’s.  Many have said that Tom Hiddleston’s performance is one of the highlights of the Marvel movies, and while I’m not as convinced, he certainly is the most interesting antagonist here.  He manages to be in turn both pitiable and menacing.  Of course, it’s no surprise that it turns out that Loki is also sneaky and deceptive, but still the eventual reveal of what he is up to is unexpected.

So overall, I like Thor: The Dark World, but I also find it quite unsurprising, like it’s the inevitable result of every other action or adventure film ever made.  I realize that’s a comment that could be leveled at all sorts of blockbusters coming out of Hollywood, but I somehow felt more aware of it as Thor‘s story unfolded before me.  It started right at the opening, which is straight out of The Lord of the Rings – with an extended narration-driven flashback demonstrating how a previous generation defeated a master-villain and his omnidestructive super-weapon, but couldn’t actually destroy the weapon and couldn’t totally defeat the villain either.  It continued as we saw Thor defeat with one blow a really big opponent in a moment that echoed a favorite scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark.  The feeling returned when Thor and Jane returned from that remote planet they were trapped in via a coincidence as convenient as the one employed by Kirk in the rebooted Star Trek.  Other things kept bringing it up as well – the Doctor Who-like mystery of the strange time portals (as well the special effects of the journey to Asgard looked abit like the time vortex), the Silence of the Lambs-like cells that Loki is imprisoned in, the way being far beyond our mortal ken waging war in our backyards wearing pseudo-mystical battle armor was reminiscent of Man of Steel,  so much more.

I’m overstating it a bit, but really, there was bit after bit that kept bringing other movies and shows into mind.  I’m almost tempted to see it again so I can keep a log.  Now, it’s not that any of that makes this a bad movie.  Again, I liked it.  It just feels like very much a product of it’s time – a well-prepared meal made up of favorite ingredients, all cooked up into a satisfying but familiar meal.

One thought on “Thor: The Dark World

  1. While I can agree with some of that, ultimately, you stated the case “that’s a comment that could be leveled at all sorts of blockbusters coming out of Hollywood”

    I mean, that was one of my main points with Man of Steel, although I think it was even more obvious in that film, These are the tropes that nearly all fantasy scifi films are playing with these days. I can’t see that Thor 2 did it more or less. At least they tried to mix it up in the end, bouncing between worlds instead of just completely destroying another city.

    Natalie Portman, an actress I am no longer interested in seeing on any screen, was much better in this one than the last. Loki is dangerously close to being over used, but it didn’t go to far in this film, and as you pointed out, his parts were once again the high points. Hopefully, (but doubtfully) he will not appear again until the third Thor film. He needs to remain in this part of the Marvel universe, and let other villains shine in the Avengers, etc)

    I was left with the feeling of wanting more from this film. I want to know more about some of the Asgardian characters, I’m starting to care about characters like Sif and Heimdal. Hogun, of the warriors three, getting that moment where Thor tells him to stay with his people, where his heart is…and you just get this glimpse into these background characters to flesh them out a little bit, and thus fleshing out these “9 realms” just a bit. I almost cared when Thor’s mum gets killed, even though I can barely remember her from this first film. Malekith wasn’t a deep character, but they just needed a “big bad” to move this story along. This movie was all about building these characters presented in the first film, fleshing them out, and moving them forward. I’m annoyed at the shallow characterization of Thor…..from the 1st movie, he falls in love fast, he gets super humbled fast. and its all clearly changed him ALOT really fast. Aren’t these characters supposed to be already hundreds of years old? Had Thor really never had any humbling experience in his whole life before the last film? That something that took place in not much than a couple days would change him that much, that he no longer wants to be king, doesn’t resemble the arrogant, brash, take no prisoners blowhard in the first film…even at all. At least some of the other characters pointed it out….depressed in love Thor (Emo-Thor??) is not nearly as enjoyable. It just feels like weak characterization to me……..BUT THEN I think “wait a minute, I’m wanting character depth from THOR, of all characters” I never expected I would like or care this much about Thor before the first movie. I think Marvel deserves so much credit for that.

    Ultimately, I think this film, like the first, is way better than it should be. It pains me that Xmen, Superman, Green Lantern, get so mistreated, yet here’s Thor 2, a pretty fun, quite well done film.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s